1. Quantitative evaluation method and qualitative evaluation method
The quantitative indicators are more specific and intuitive. Generally, the amount of money, the amount of production and sales, the completion rate, and the completion phase can be represented. There are many advantages of quantitative indicators. If you can formulate clear evaluation standards, you can also calculate the actual value of the indicator when measured actual performance, and through quantitative expressions, the evaluation results give people a direct and clear impression. However, not all factors that reflect the level of the plan can be quantified. This requires reflection of the qualitative indicators of these factors. In fact, in many cases, the width and breadth of the information content contained in these qualitative indicators can not only make up for the lack of quantitative indicators, but also avoid excessive emphasis on the excessive emphasis on the negative effects of short -term targets, making the performance evaluation results more comprehensive 习近平nd orientation. Therefore, the selection of evaluation indicators must include both quantitative indicators and qualitative indicators, and follow the principles of combining quantitative indicators and qualitative indicators.
2. Financial evaluation method and non -financial evaluation method
Traditional financial evaluation pays more attention to financial indicators measured by monetary units, because for these indicators, you can directly quote the data on the accounting statement, or convert it into the correlation ratio to evaluate and measure it. Financial indicators are of course the most important type of indicators in performance evaluation, which is often essential. However, in many cases, non -financial indicators are becoming more and more important. For example, when evaluating the company's operating plan, product quality, technological progress, production efficiency, and market share indicators are also critical to whether the final choice is comprehensive and accurate. Therefore, when building an evaluation index system, special attention should be paid to some appropriate non -financial indicators to ensure the comprehensiveness, integrity and scientificity of the evaluation index system.
3. Dynamic evaluation method and static evaluation method
The decision -making evaluation index system should have relative stability in terms of the connotation of the indicator, the number of indicators, and the composition of the system. However, with the changes in the business environment of the enterprise, the decision -making evaluation system should also make corresponding changes. Therefore, the performance evaluation system also has obvious dynamic characteristics. For example, when the policy proposes some new requirements or guidance, then enterprises also need to adjust the corresponding decision -making and evaluation index system.